Comments on: Smart CMS For Small Sites: GetSimple

By: Atmoner

Atmoner — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:12:39 +0000

I have tet this cms: https://sourceforge.net/projects/small-cms/

It’s very good coding

By: thom

thom — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:20:58 +0000

Try Pulse CMS. http://pulsecms.com

By: Zábavná videa

Zábavná videa — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:34:59 +0000

Nice CMS, easy and lite. Thanks

By: ricbax

ricbax — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:51:20 +0000

Looks like a downsized WordPress, very simple, lookforward to seeing what happens though and if you can keep it simple and still give it some flexibility

By: YASIN

YASIN — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:15:18 +0000

very , that a XML-based Application is faster than a databased

By: just

just — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:06:23 +0000

I don’t think that a XML-based Application is faster than a databased. Usually these are faster, but maybe there is a good chaching….

By: fo

fo — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:04:00 +0000

I’m going to have to disagree with the performance bit regarding xml vs sql. Unless you have a super-slow MySQL server, a DB connection is likely to perform as well or better than an xml implementation.

XML does have other benefits over a DB driven site, but performance is not one of them.

By: dominik

dominik — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:00:41 +0000

For file based CMS check out NanoCMS at http://www.nanocms.in

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:04:14 +0000

@Marc – It’s still in it’s infancy stage – and in the roadmap I have listed the two things you’ve spoke of. Once I get a bug free package working, I will be updating with some of the roadmap features.

@jzlosman – thanks! if you need any help, i’ve setup a google groups list to handle stuff like this.

Thanks everyone for checking it out! I hope it works out for a couple people out there!

By: Umut M.

Umut M. — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:10:54 +0000

@jzlosman,

I think it is the weather . Just fixed them.