<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Build Applications The Way Google Does: Closure Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webresourcesdepot.com/build-applications-the-way-google-does-closure-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webresourcesdepot.com/build-applications-the-way-google-does-closure-tools/</link>
	<description>Free Web Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Concerned Coder</title>
		<link>http://www.webresourcesdepot.com/build-applications-the-way-google-does-closure-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-89229</link>
		<dc:creator>Concerned Coder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webresourcesdepot.com/?p=1265#comment-89229</guid>
		<description>Coders beware - just because Closure shares the Google moniker, it doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s the javascript library of the century.... Read this for a few reasons why you may want to think twice before adopting the library: http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/11/12/google-closure-how-not-to-write-javascript/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coders beware &#8211; just because Closure shares the Google moniker, it doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s the javascript library of the century&#8230;. Read this for a few reasons why you may want to think twice before adopting the library: <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/11/12/google-closure-how-not-to-write-javascript/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/11/12/google-closure-how-not-to-write-javascript/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BloggingDeveloper</title>
		<link>http://www.webresourcesdepot.com/build-applications-the-way-google-does-closure-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-88326</link>
		<dc:creator>BloggingDeveloper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webresourcesdepot.com/?p=1265#comment-88326</guid>
		<description>Closure Compiler - the javascript compiler, is really working well. The strongest part of the Closure Compiler is that it does not only remove whitespace but also it rewrites Javascript Code to make it smaller. It also optimizes your Javascript code to perform better. I compared the performance of YUI Compressor and Closure Compiler. Results can be found at: http://www.bloggingdeveloper.com/post/Closure-Compiler-vs-YUI-Compressor-Comparing-the-Javascript-Compression-Tools.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Closure Compiler &#8211; the javascript compiler, is really working well. The strongest part of the Closure Compiler is that it does not only remove whitespace but also it rewrites Javascript Code to make it smaller. It also optimizes your Javascript code to perform better. I compared the performance of YUI Compressor and Closure Compiler. Results can be found at: <a href="http://www.bloggingdeveloper.com/post/Closure-Compiler-vs-YUI-Compressor-Comparing-the-Javascript-Compression-Tools.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloggingdeveloper.com/post/Closure-Compiler-vs-YUI-Compressor-Comparing-the-Javascript-Compression-Tools.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using wincache
Page Caching using wincache (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/10 queries in -3.929 seconds using wincache

Served from: www.webresourcesdepot.com @ 2012-02-13 05:58:53 -->
